Skip to main content
OpenConf small logo

Providing all your submission and review needs
Abstract and paper submission, peer-review, discussion, shepherding, program, proceedings, and much more

Worldwide & Multilingual
OpenConf has powered thousands of events and journals in over 100 countries and more than a dozen languages.

Can Negotiation Cause Harm? Examining the Externalities of the Negotiation Modes

Abstract: Negotiation is widely regarded as an effective tool for conflict resolution, fostering cooperation and integrative solutions. However, its impact on external stakeholders—those absent from the bargaining table—remains underexplored. This research investigates how interactive and nominal negotiation modes influence externalities, i.e., unintended consequences affecting third parties. Across five studies, with a sixth planned, we demonstrate that interactive negotiations enhance communication and coordination between negotiating parties, which can amplify both positive and negative externalities depending on the context. In contrast, nominal negotiations, by limiting direct interaction, appear to foster greater concern for external stakeholders. Our findings suggest that the cognitive and motivational resources dedicated to internal conflict resolution in interactive negotiations may detract from consideration of external consequences. This work challenges the assumption that negotiation always leads to optimal outcomes and offers practical insights into managing negotiation strategies to better address broader societal concerns.

Keywords: negotiation externalities, interactive versus nominal negotiation, positive and negative externalities, decision-making consequences

Kai Zhang,  Leuphana University, Germany | kai.zhang@leuphana.de

Brian Gunia,  Johns Hopkins University, United States | brian.gunia@jhu.edu

Julia Bear,  Stony Brook University, United States | julia.bear@stonybrook.edu

Roman Trötschel,  Leuphana University, Germany | roman.troetschel@leuphana.de