Skip to main content
IACM 2024

Full Program »

New Perspectives On Gender Bias and Inequity In Organizations

Authors:

Anyi Ma University of Wisconsin-Madison
United States
Orcid: 

Stav Atir University of Wisconsin-Madison
United States
Orcid: 

Jungwoo Ha ESDES Lyon Business School
France
Orcid: 

Margaret Ormiston George Washington University
United States
Orcid: 

Elaine Wong University of California, Riverside
United States
Orcid: 

Zhiyu Feng Renmin University of China
China
Orcid: 

Yixin Tian Singapore Management University
Singapore
Orcid: 

Abigail Collins University of Wisconsin-Madison
United States
Orcid: 

Chia-Jung Tsay University of Wisconsin-Madison
United States
Orcid: 

Ivuoma Onyeador Northwestern University
United States
Orcid: 

Felix Danbold University College London
United Kingdom
Orcid: 

Clarissa Cortland University College London
United Kingdom
Orcid: 

Zoe Kinias University of Western Ontario
Canada
Orcid: 

Abstract: This symposium explores several aspects of gender-based prejudice and bias in the workplace. We showcase recent novel insights into gender biases in the evaluation of leaders, strategies employed by leaders to address gender-related issues, and approaches to foster support for gender equity initiatives. Papers 1 and 2 identify novel gender biases in evaluation of leaders. First, women and male CEOs face different repercussions for engaging in self-promotion. Second, they reap different rewards and punishments for engaging in communal behaviors, the nuanced of which are captured by the newly introduced SPaCE model. The next two papers explore how organizational leaders tackle gender-related issues. Male organizational leaders grapple with credibility challenges when addressing gender-related issues, which they often resolve by is refencing personal connections with women, especially with daughters. Though the strategy is effective, it is also misleading, as fathers of daughters are not more gender egalitarian than other men. Paper 4 explores what happens when employees accused of biased speech make appeals to free speech. Such appeals are found to diminish managers' recognition of workplace bias severity and deservingness of punishment, effects that persist in response to various interventions and which cut across demographics. Finally, Paper 5 introduces a promising avenue for garnering broad support for gender equity initiatives. It develops and validates a new construct, Social Impact Leader (SIL) identity, and shows that, in a field study, a SIL intervention motivated participation in gender equity initiatives. Together, these papers contribute significantly to multiple ongoing conversations about equity, diversity, and inclusion.

Track: DEI

Keywords: prejudice; diversity; intergroup relations; experimental


 

 


Powered by OpenConf®
Copyright ©2002-2023 Zakon Group LLC