Skip to main content
2019 International Association for Conflict Management Conference

Full Program »

The Power of Silence: Using Sentiment Text Analysis to Examine Twitter Responses to Sexual Harassment Accounts

Keywords: sexual harassment, apology, denial, text analysis

Abstract: This research explores how alleged sexual harassers are perceived when using apologies, denials, or reticence in responding to real sexual harassment allegations. Understanding which responses elicit greater negative responses has important conflict management implications (Sitkin & Bies, 1993). We build on prior research showing conflicting findings about the effectiveness of apologies and denials(Dunn & Cody, 2000; Ferrin, Kim, Cooper & Dirks, 2007), and add to the literature investigating reticence. Using a state of the art neural network approach to sentiment analysis, we analyzed 214,000 Twitter posts about 315 high-profile accusations of sexual misconduct. We found that reticence elicits less negative sentiment than apologies and denials. We also found that denials elicit less negative sentiment than apologies in responding to sexual harassment allegations. We discuss future opportunities for experimental research of this phenomenon and the implications this research may have for the #MeToo movement.

Michelle Chambers, University of Utah

Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, University of Southern California

Rachael Goodwin, University of Utah

Samamtha Dodson, University of Utah

Leigh Yeh, University of Southern California

Morteza Dehghani, University of Southern California

Jesee Graham, University of Utah

Kristina Diekmann, University of Utah


Powered by OpenConf®
Copyright ©2002-2018 Zakon Group LLC